|
To be perfectly honest, I want to like Temple and I want it to
be a good restaurant. I like modern design and Temple is the only place
in town where I can get a legitimate dose of contemporary elegance. If
only they could get those pesky kinks ironed out...
Usually it takes a year for a restaurant to figure out want it wants
to be and what works in the market - in the absence of doing that, the
restaurant usually fails. Temple has chugged along for several years,
pressing through multiple menu concept changes and still hasn't really
found their niche. Personally, I liked the first menu the best. Granted
it was lengthy, with a sophisticated tasting menu and I can only presume
it was deemed too costly on the business side.
Currently, the menu is of a fairly average length and sophistication.
We thought the first courses involved too many salads and the only thing
that really caught our fancy was the white asparagus veloute ($10). I
liked the all-white presentation and the soup was nice and the white
asparagus garnish perfectly cooked. I did however find a lump of
something brown in the bottom of the bowl. At first I thought it was
supposed to be there, because it didn't taste bad, but there was only
one, so we decided it was a stowaway.
For our mains Patty had the rack of lamb ($36) and I had the
tenderloin with foie gras ($39). The meat for both dishes was cooked
perfectly to order, as were the accompanying vegetables. My foie gras
was a little overcooked for my preference, but I imagine my preference
is probably on the undercooked side. Our observation was a thoughtful
execution all round, however we thought the seasoning was a little
heavy. We like a pretty intensely flavoured dish and don't shy away from
salt, but it was borderline too much for us and made us think it would
be over the top for some people.
Overall, we thought the food was really good, but priced a little
high. If you're going to push above the $30 price point, I need to see
something pretty exceptional. If nothing else, I would have made the
foie gras on the steak optional and charged a supplement - I still would
have ordered it, but I wouldn't have felt like I was ordering a $40
steak. Similarly, the main courses were pretty standard. Some nice ideas
and good executions, but everyone in town has the same menu (one
halibut, one salmon, one lamb, one beef and one vegetarian) and again at
this price point I would have liked to see it mixed up a bit.
The service was fantastic. Sure, there were two servers and three
tables, so it should be good, but I was impressed nonetheless. Both
servers, tolerated our endless questions and gathered accurate answers
from the kitchen when they didn't know the answers themselves. They
exhibited an above average level of wine knowledge and were generally
swell guys to chat with for a couple of hours.
They wine list is acceptable, with a reasonable selection and
balance. Weirdly, there are no vintages - even on the reserve list. If
I'm going to pay over $50 (let alone $250) for a bottle of wine, I want
to see the vintage. They should do more with the wine list,
because to me this space screams out wine bar. Fair enough, I like wine
bars, but I don't think I'm the only one. Give me more wines by the
glass and I'll come more often. Similarly, improve the small plate menu
and I'll come drink and eat even more often.
I used to visit Temple often, to drink and to eat, often in the later
part of the evening. I liked the space and it was unique in Victoria.
They have, since then, made too many menu design changes and people no
longer know what to expect. I think they need to start pushing the
booze, encourage small plates and get back to being a 'fun' place to go.
An of course, the bed -- they need to get rid of it and put something
new in its place. The bed was cool when they opened, but it's out of
fashion now and everyone in town makes jokes about it. Make the bed
space dynamic - make it functional art. If it's art, people will want to
see it.
My impression is that they need to get back to their roots. They
don't need to be the same as they were, but they need to embrace the
modernist concept they started with. Spend the weekend in a big city,
get inspired and bring it home.
value of food 74/100
quality of food 77/100
wine and beverage 70/100
service 90/100
ambiance 81/100
average 78/100
reviewed August 13, 2006
Having tried to visit the Temple on numerous occasions and failing, we
finally walked by when it was open. (For whatever reason, their website
states that they're open every day and for an extended period of time
that was not the reality.)
After a slightly awkward seating experience (apparently, the server
needed to check with the manager before he could seat us at one several
empty tables), we took our seats and were quickly attended to by a
friendly server.
Every time I go to the Temple the menu gets a little shorter, and
this time they managed to get the booze and food lists on to two pages.
Not a bad thing, we didn't struggle to make decisions. The wine list
however, was a bit brief for my taste, but selections were acceptable.
We ended up with the 2003 Tinhorn Creek merlot ($37).
Since we're on a post-vacation diet, we opted to split our appy,
settling on the tuna capaccio with heirloom tomatoes ($11). However, it
was less like a carpaccio and more like slices of smoked tuna. Both the
tuna and the tomatoes tasted nice and we were surprised by the freshness
of the tomatoes this late in the season.
I had the halibut, with clams and yam and chorizo hash ($20). A
pretty simple dish, it was very appropriate for my diet. The fish was
fried with salt and pepper to a proper doneness. The clams were fresh,
but most notable was the yam and chorizo hash. I nice idea, well
executed, but I would have liked a little more heat in the sausage.
Patty had the beef tenderloin on cornbread with green bean salad
($21). Presented elegantly and cooked just shy of medium rare it was a
satisfying choice. Patty was extremely enthusiastic about the use of
corn bread as starch, saying that the sweetness and saltiness of the
corn complemented the dish well. Having the cold green bean salad as an
accompaniment on this hot dish, did strike Patty as unusual. While, they
were flavourful, he noted the culinary school adage that you don't serve
a cold item on a hot dish. Whether, the chef broke this rule
deliberately or not, we don't know.
Of course, the Temple, is a beautiful restaurant (with exception to
the silly bed in the middle of the room) and there's no doubt that it's
a nice space to dine in. The service was good and we were pleased with
the affordability of the menu.
We also noted that they have a mussels and Belgian beer night on
Thursdays - $10 for the beer and a bowl of mussels. I'll be back to
check that out.
Value of Food: 8/10
Quality of Food: 7.5/10
Service: 8/10
Ambiance: 8.5/10
Wine List: 6/10
Reviewed: October 24, 2005
|